The Verdict on Drug Courts and Other Problem-Solving Courts
نویسنده
چکیده
Scientists, in contrast, rarely speak of verdicts. To the scientist, virtually all conclusions are provisional and subject to revision as new data become available. Much of what is believed to be true turns out, after the collection of more information, to be only partially true, conditionally true, or sometimes outright false.1 It is, therefore, most prudent to withhold final judgment until all of the relevant facts are in. Unfortunately, for most matters, all of the relevant facts are never fully in or sufficiently understood.
منابع مشابه
Just the (Unweildy, Hard to Gether, but Nonetheless Essential) Facts, Ma'am: What We Know and Don't Know About Problem-Solving Courts
This article asses what is known and what remains to be understood about problem-solving courts. Specifically, the article asserts that drug courts serve a needy population, court mandated treatment programs have higher retention rates, those who participate longer have better outcomes, those in drug courts had lower rates of recidivism, drug use, and that graduated sanctions have statistically...
متن کاملDRUG COURTS – LESSONS FROM THE UK AND BEYOND Gill McIvor THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DRUG COURTS
Drug courts were established initially in the United States in the late 1980s, initiated by sentencers who were frustrated at the limited range and effectiveness of existing criminal justice measures for dealing with drug-related crime. The first drug court was introduced in Dade County, Florida in 1989. The impetus for the establishment of drug courts in North America came from a growing ackno...
متن کاملChanging Practices: The Specialised Domestic Violence Court Process
Specialised domestic violence courts, initially developed in the United States of America, have been recognised by other jurisdictions including Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. This article presents a case study of K Court in Toronto, drawing upon documentary evidence, direct observations and interviews with key informants. It is argued that the specialised domestic violence court pro...
متن کاملFront-Stage Stars and Backstage Producers: The Role of Judges in Problem-Solving Courts().
In problem-solving courts judges are no longer neutral arbitrators in adversarial justice processes. Instead, judges directly engage with court participants. The movement towards problem-solving court models emerges from a collaborative therapeutic jurisprudence framework. While most scholars argue judges are the central courtroom actors within problem-solving courts, we find judges are the sta...
متن کاملA testable theory of problem solving courts: Avoiding past empirical and legal failures.
Recent years have seen a proliferation of problem solving courts designed to rehabilitate certain classes of offenders and thereby resolve the underlying problems that led to their court involvement in the first place. Some commentators have reacted positively to these courts, considering them an extension of the philosophy and logic of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, but others show concern that th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011